Continue reading »]]>

Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community

Continue reading »]]>

Mobile, Alabama (The Weekly Vice) – John Theodore Reutcke, a 55-year-old Mobile resident was jailed after he allegedly faked a stroke so he could receive pain medicine.

According to Mobile Police, Reutcke checked himself into the Springhill Medical Center, complaining of having stroke-like symptoms.

Medical staff performed several procedures on Reutcke and determined that he never had a stroke. They also discovered that he used a false name false social security number, fraudulent insurance coverage information and fabricated veteran benefits when he checked into the hospital.

Reutcke reportedly received more than $ 20,000 in hospital services that were never required, according to detectives.

Investigators say the hospital contacted police, who discovered that this was not the first time Reutcke committed a crime of this nature.

He has a long criminal history in several states dating back to 1992, including 5 arrests for attempting fraud at hospitals in California, Washington, and Florida.

Reutcke was booked into jail and charged with theft by deception. He was denied bond, and officers consider him a flight risk.

Mandi Milenko
The Weekly Vice

Join The Discussion. Click Comment Link Below And Fire Away
Ready For More Seriously Messed Up News? Join Us On Facebook!

THE WEEKLY VICE

Continue reading »]]>

Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community

Continue reading »]]>

The Weekly Vice

Join The Discussion. Click Comment Link Below And Fire Away
Ready For More Seriously Messed Up News? Join Us On Facebook!

THE WEEKLY VICE

Continue reading »]]>

Let me tell we a story about Dan Harmon, who was fired from “Community” on Friday night.

Several years ago, when “The Sarah Silverman” module debuted, we wrote a review of it. we didn’t like it much; it usually wasn’t my thing, and we pronounced as most in my review.

Within a day or dual of that examination appearing, a criticism seemed on that examination — a unequivocally disastrous one from someone named Dan Harmon. we reliable with Comedy Central that a criticism was, in fact, left by Harmon, who was afterwards a writer/producer on Silverman’s show. (I didn’t wish anything on my site that had been left underneath his name if it wasn’t indeed from him.) It was him. And afterwards we beheld that my site was removing some trade from MySpace (remember, this was some-more than 5 years ago).

Turns out Harmon posted a some-more severe reprove of me on his MySpace page, since what he’d left on my site apparently hadn’t been oppressive adequate for him. Needless to say, both comments weren’t nominal toward me or my intelligence. They weren’t easy to read. When someone writes, “You demeanour like an simpleton … I’m looking into a 3 pixels that paint your eyes and right into your mediocre soul,” that tends to hang with you.

I’m not observant any of this to raise on Dan Harmon. we positively am not; he’s had a bad adequate week. I’m observant this since we wish to make a point: He’s substantially as formidable to work with as all a stories contend he is. But formed on what he’s achieved with “Community,” he’s value it.

As we said, we didn’t generally suffer those comments when we review them for a initial time. But here’s something that’s also true: we was means to comprehend that his comments about me were unequivocally well-written. Want proof?

A crony of mind, a author Claire Zulkey, does a unchanging eventuality called Funny Ha-Ha, where people get adult and review comical things they’ve written. She invited me to be partial of it a integrate of times, and I’m wakeful adequate of my possess stipulations to know that I’m not all that funny. So twice (without observant who wrote it), we review Harmon’s malediction during Funny Ha-Ha, and ladies and gentlemen, it killed. Both times.

The diatribe has a indicate of perspective that Harmon meticulously, if angrily, got across. It’s unequivocally distant from being a general indignant Internet comment; it’s usually another instance of Harmon proof that he’s unstoppable (and flattering diverting) when he’s got something to say.

Now, we competence wonder, did that curse criticism make it harder for me to like “Community” during first? we wondered about that for a very, unequivocally prolonged time — trust me, we suspicion about it a lot. And I’ve come to dual conclusions:

• “Community” done it tough for me to like it, generally in a initial season. we gave it a lot of chances in Seasons 1 and 2, and we appreciated what a expel was doing, yet a uncover didn’t utterly click for me since of a enmity meta techniques, that weren’t expertly tied to characters we cared about in a early days. It wasn’t due to a fact that Harmon had called me an idiot, we don’t think.
• My small online knowledge with Harmon didn’t impact my perspective of a uncover much, we don’t think, yet it did make it tough for me to see a lot of my colleagues in a media flattering over a guy. I’ll acknowledge that that rankled now and again. I’m usually human, after all.

But we know what? The uncover itself eventually won me over. Last year, we became a late modify interjection to a overwhelming luminosity of “Remedial Chaos Theory,” and when we adore something, we tend to adore it 150 percent. we commend that not each partial of “Community” is great, and there are still certain things about it that bug me during times, yet we sat down to watch that partial with an open mind and we totally fell for a Greendale Seven, that done me unequivocally happy. we went behind and watched Season 2 and have steadily watched Season 3, a culmination of that was very pleasing, we thought.

What I’m perplexing to get during here is this: When something, or someone, is difficult, we work on it. When someone rubs we a wrong way, we acknowledge that, figure out how to pierce forward, and pierce forward. Why couldn’t NBC and Sony do this?

After all, executives there are paid a lot some-more than we am to put adult with a ethereal egos and definite flaws of artistic people. And I’m of a opinion that whatever container Harmon brought to a list was value putting adult with. For him to be shown a doorway yet removing a singular phone call from NBC or Sony Pictures Television, as he says in this post about being fired, is offensive — yet some-more importantly, it’s unsuited on a partial of those above him in a food chain.

I’m not observant each showrunner should get divided with all — distant from it — yet during a unequivocally least, there should have been discussions in a final few weeks with Harmon about his destiny with a show. And if NBC and Sony weren’t going to go brazen with Harmon as showrunner, they should have put on their big-boy pants and canceled a comedy. If Harmon during a helm of “Community” was usually too some-more difficulty than they wanted to understanding with, they should have pulled a plug, yet they didn’t have a guts.

NBC and Sony are not creation widgets and not merely replacing a manager who couldn’t get his people to accommodate their widget quota. As most as a business competence engage rupturing and dicing Nielsen numbers, it’s not, during a finish of a day, about cold numbers and upsurge charts. Some shows do engage widgets and some shows are surfaced by executive producers who can be transposed during will. “Community” is not one of those shows, and for Sony and NBC keep a uncover going yet though Harmon — well, that’s usually dumb. That’s not a hit on a new “Community” showrunners, that’s a hit on myopic TV executives.

I will outline that Harmon can be a tough man to get along with. My long-ago, teenager knowledge aside, many convincing articles and sources have pronounced so. But we don’t need him to be my friend, nor should a executives during Sony and NBC. we need him to make an resourceful uncover with a lot of heart and wit, a uncover that is flushed with a sold gleeful/bittersweet indicate of view. Harmon did that, whatever problems Sony and NBC competence have had with his government style.

Look, artistic forms can be a genuine pain in a ass. There aren’t a ton of showrunners who make a trains run on time, make something coming art and are also good to everybody (there are a few, and they are value their weight in gold). But that’s a business “creative” executives are in. It’s messy, it’s not easy, yet if TV executives wanted to go into something some-more predicted and reduction stressful, because not try accounting?

So, Dan Harmon, we forgave we a prolonged time ago for what we wrote about me, even yet it harm my feelings during a time. we understood, even then, that what stirred your indignant response was a fact that your feelings had been hurt. Sensitive forms aren’t always fun to be around (and this is something we can describe to). we understood, afterwards and now, that we caring about what we do. I’m certain we still caring about “Community.”

And as Alan Sepinwall wrote here, we consider that shows with singular visions that remove their showrunners late in their runs are mostly most worse for it. I’m sadly certain that will be a box here. This is one of those cases where something like a thing we desired will usually be a sign of how most we skip a thing we loved.

I’ll skip Harmon’s “Community.” And we consider NBC and Sony executives have no suspicion of a shitstorm they usually created. So I’ll leave an indignant Internet criticism of my own: Whoever suspicion it would be a good suspicion to embankment Harmon is a business-casual potted plant. You’re VH1, “Robocop 2,” “Back to a Future 3.”

You’re Jim Belushi.

Follow Maureen Ryan on Twitter:

www.twitter.com/moryan